Sleep restriction, prevalent in modern society, impairs inhibitory control, but literature reveals inconsistencies in these effects. We hypothesized that these inconsistencies might stem from variations in how individuals perceive task demands, particularly expected or favoured responses. To test this, we investigated the impact of sleep restriction (4 h) on learning and inhibitory control in a predictable yet uncertain environment, focusing on built-up expectations. Using a two-session go/no-go task with varying probabilities of go stimuli (20–50–80%), we compared sleep-restricted (SR; N = 32) and well-rested (N = 34) participants. Both groups showed similar performance trends, with higher commission errors and faster reactions as go probability increased. Contrary to expectations, we found no group differences in inhibitory control. A computational model incorporating adaptive learning dynamics revealed that SR participants exhibited diminished perception of environmental volatility, suggesting challenges in detecting task environment changes and updating beliefs. These findings highlight sleep’s crucial role in maintaining cognitive function, particularly in dynamic environments, and offer new insights into the cognitive consequences of sleep loss.

Predictions under sleep restriction: the effects of partial sleep deprivation on learning and inhibitory control

Visalli, Antonino;Degasperi, Giorgia;Sellaro, Roberta;Cellini, Nicola
2026

Abstract

Sleep restriction, prevalent in modern society, impairs inhibitory control, but literature reveals inconsistencies in these effects. We hypothesized that these inconsistencies might stem from variations in how individuals perceive task demands, particularly expected or favoured responses. To test this, we investigated the impact of sleep restriction (4 h) on learning and inhibitory control in a predictable yet uncertain environment, focusing on built-up expectations. Using a two-session go/no-go task with varying probabilities of go stimuli (20–50–80%), we compared sleep-restricted (SR; N = 32) and well-rested (N = 34) participants. Both groups showed similar performance trends, with higher commission errors and faster reactions as go probability increased. Contrary to expectations, we found no group differences in inhibitory control. A computational model incorporating adaptive learning dynamics revealed that SR participants exhibited diminished perception of environmental volatility, suggesting challenges in detecting task environment changes and updating beliefs. These findings highlight sleep’s crucial role in maintaining cognitive function, particularly in dynamic environments, and offer new insights into the cognitive consequences of sleep loss.
2026
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
rsos.252345.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Published (Publisher's Version of Record)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.51 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.51 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3605619
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex 0
social impact