The seismic risk assessment of large building stocks is crucial for informed asset management in earthquake-prone regions, providing decision-support for retrofit intervention planning. Many existing methodologies focus on a single structural typology or asset class (e.g., ordinary buildings or industrial facilities), thus limiting their applicability to mixed portfolios. This study proposes a comprehensive and adaptable methodology for the seismic assessment of diverse building stocks—a cross-typology approach encompassing masonry, reinforced concrete (r.c.), precast r.c., and steel structures. The approach integrates deficiency-based qualitative evaluations with simplified mechanical models tailored for each building class. Where validated methodologies were unavailable, new assessment tools were developed. The proposed framework was applied to an industrial-oriented building stock comprising 79 structural units at regional scale, demonstrating its capability to identify priority structures for retrofitting interventions. By overcoming the constraints of typology- or asset-specific approaches, this methodology enables a more comprehensive and scalable assessment. This ultimately contributes to effective risk mitigation planning and seismic resilience enhancing.
Enhancing Asset Management: Rapid Seismic Assessment of Heterogeneous Portfolios
Gaspari Marco;Fabris Margherita;Saler Elisa
;Dona Marco
;da Porto Francesca
2025
Abstract
The seismic risk assessment of large building stocks is crucial for informed asset management in earthquake-prone regions, providing decision-support for retrofit intervention planning. Many existing methodologies focus on a single structural typology or asset class (e.g., ordinary buildings or industrial facilities), thus limiting their applicability to mixed portfolios. This study proposes a comprehensive and adaptable methodology for the seismic assessment of diverse building stocks—a cross-typology approach encompassing masonry, reinforced concrete (r.c.), precast r.c., and steel structures. The approach integrates deficiency-based qualitative evaluations with simplified mechanical models tailored for each building class. Where validated methodologies were unavailable, new assessment tools were developed. The proposed framework was applied to an industrial-oriented building stock comprising 79 structural units at regional scale, demonstrating its capability to identify priority structures for retrofitting interventions. By overcoming the constraints of typology- or asset-specific approaches, this methodology enables a more comprehensive and scalable assessment. This ultimately contributes to effective risk mitigation planning and seismic resilience enhancing.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
buildings-15-02560-v3.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Published (Publisher's Version of Record)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
3.76 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
3.76 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.