Background: Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, permit improved treatment of type 1 diabetes (T1D). Unfortunately, malfunctioning in the insulin pump or in the infusion set can prevent insulin from being administered, reducing the AID efficacy and posing the patient at risk. Different data-driven methods available in the literature can be used to deal with the problem of automatically detecting complete insulin suspension in real-time. This article investigates both supervised and unsupervised strategies and proposes a fair comparison under either population or personalized settings. Methods: Several algorithms are compared using data generated through the UVA/Padova T1D simulator, a computer simulator widely used to test control strategies in silico and accepted by the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) as a substitute to animal pre-clinical trials. Two synthetic data sets, each consisting of 100 virtual subjects monitored for 1 month, were generated. Occasional faults of the insulin pump are simulated as complete occlusions by suspending the therapy administration. Personalized algorithms are investigated with unsupervised approaches only, since personalized labels are hardly available. Results: In the population scenario, the supervised approach outperforms the unsupervised strategy. In particular, logistic regression and random forest achieves a recall of 72% and 82%, with 0.12 and 0.21 false positives (FP) per day, respectively. In the personalized setting scenario, the unsupervised algorithms are tailored on each patient and outperform the population ones, in particular isolation forest achieves a recall 80% and 0.06 FPs per day. Conclusions: This article suggests that unsupervised personalized approach, by addressing the large variability in glucose response among individuals with T1D, is superior to other one-fits-all approaches in detecting insulin suspensions caused by malfunctioning. Population methodologies can be effectively used while waiting to collect sufficient patient data, when the system is installed on a new patient.
Supervised and Unsupervised Approaches for the Real-Time Detection of Undesired Insulin Suspension Caused by Malfunctions
Idi, Elena;Facchinetti, Andrea;Sparacino, Giovanni;Del Favero, Simone
2024
Abstract
Background: Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, permit improved treatment of type 1 diabetes (T1D). Unfortunately, malfunctioning in the insulin pump or in the infusion set can prevent insulin from being administered, reducing the AID efficacy and posing the patient at risk. Different data-driven methods available in the literature can be used to deal with the problem of automatically detecting complete insulin suspension in real-time. This article investigates both supervised and unsupervised strategies and proposes a fair comparison under either population or personalized settings. Methods: Several algorithms are compared using data generated through the UVA/Padova T1D simulator, a computer simulator widely used to test control strategies in silico and accepted by the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) as a substitute to animal pre-clinical trials. Two synthetic data sets, each consisting of 100 virtual subjects monitored for 1 month, were generated. Occasional faults of the insulin pump are simulated as complete occlusions by suspending the therapy administration. Personalized algorithms are investigated with unsupervised approaches only, since personalized labels are hardly available. Results: In the population scenario, the supervised approach outperforms the unsupervised strategy. In particular, logistic regression and random forest achieves a recall of 72% and 82%, with 0.12 and 0.21 false positives (FP) per day, respectively. In the personalized setting scenario, the unsupervised algorithms are tailored on each patient and outperform the population ones, in particular isolation forest achieves a recall 80% and 0.06 FPs per day. Conclusions: This article suggests that unsupervised personalized approach, by addressing the large variability in glucose response among individuals with T1D, is superior to other one-fits-all approaches in detecting insulin suspensions caused by malfunctioning. Population methodologies can be effectively used while waiting to collect sufficient patient data, when the system is installed on a new patient.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.