This paper aims to reconsider the textual state of Apul. flor. 2, 10, where most editors print Helm’s conjecture eminens for the paradosis eminus. I argue that a comparison with Lucr. vi 743, which is one of the main intertexts of this passage, strongly supports remittens, a conjecture already suggested by P. Thomas.
Il modello di Lucrezio e una congettura negletta ad Apul. flor. 2, 10
Leonardo Galli
2022
Abstract
This paper aims to reconsider the textual state of Apul. flor. 2, 10, where most editors print Helm’s conjecture eminens for the paradosis eminus. I argue that a comparison with Lucr. vi 743, which is one of the main intertexts of this passage, strongly supports remittens, a conjecture already suggested by P. Thomas.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
