This comment is focused on the issue of image rights, with particular reference to civil remedies and the interference with the regulation of personal data. The debate on non-pecuniary damage assumes particular prominence, where prejudice in re ipsa and deterrent-punitive function, albeit formally disavowed by jurisprudence, seem to reappear thanks to the artifice of 'presumptions'. In today's digital economy, a further salient aspect concerns the widespread and systematic misuse of the image and personal data of unknown persons, who could resort to class actions for damages.
Indebito utilizzo dell’immagine, quale dato personale, e tutela risarcitoria
Nicola Brutti
2023
Abstract
This comment is focused on the issue of image rights, with particular reference to civil remedies and the interference with the regulation of personal data. The debate on non-pecuniary damage assumes particular prominence, where prejudice in re ipsa and deterrent-punitive function, albeit formally disavowed by jurisprudence, seem to reappear thanks to the artifice of 'presumptions'. In today's digital economy, a further salient aspect concerns the widespread and systematic misuse of the image and personal data of unknown persons, who could resort to class actions for damages.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
NGCC_03_2023_0651-BRUTTI.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Published (publisher's version)
Licenza:
Accesso privato - non pubblico
Dimensione
362.94 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
362.94 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.