The large number of existing masonry bridges still in service in the world roadway and railway networks requires that transportation system managers carry out ordinary and extraordinary maintenance. In many of these networks, the need for increasing the speed and/or weight of the traffic loads also entails the design of strengthening interventions aimed at enhancing the load-carrying capacity of masonry bridges. Among the available techniques for the strengthening of these structures, the use of fiber reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) composites has gained popularity due to their advantages with respect to more traditional techniques. More recently, the use of steel fiber reinforced mortars (SFRM), has also been investigated for the strengthening of masonry bridges, with promising results. In this paper, a limit analysis for assessing the vertical load-carrying capacity of single-span bridges strengthened with FRCM or SFRM, applied at the intrados, is described, and calibrated using available experimental results. The document highlights the variables that should be considered in such procedure and also discusses the similarities and differences between the two strengthening techniques. A subsequent parametrical analysis shows that both techniques produce comparable increments in the load carrying capacity of the masonry bridges when compared to unstrengthened conditions. In addition, it was seen that if the finite friction between blocks is not considered when performing the limit analysis of masonry bridges, the ultimate load capacity of the arches can be overestimated as the failure mode can be attained due to shear sliding of the masonry blocks, a hinge mechanism or a combination of both.

Evaluation of the vertical load capacity of masonry arch bridges strengthened with FRCM or SFRM by limit analysis

Zampieri P.
;
Simoncello N.;Pellegrino C.
2020

Abstract

The large number of existing masonry bridges still in service in the world roadway and railway networks requires that transportation system managers carry out ordinary and extraordinary maintenance. In many of these networks, the need for increasing the speed and/or weight of the traffic loads also entails the design of strengthening interventions aimed at enhancing the load-carrying capacity of masonry bridges. Among the available techniques for the strengthening of these structures, the use of fiber reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) composites has gained popularity due to their advantages with respect to more traditional techniques. More recently, the use of steel fiber reinforced mortars (SFRM), has also been investigated for the strengthening of masonry bridges, with promising results. In this paper, a limit analysis for assessing the vertical load-carrying capacity of single-span bridges strengthened with FRCM or SFRM, applied at the intrados, is described, and calibrated using available experimental results. The document highlights the variables that should be considered in such procedure and also discusses the similarities and differences between the two strengthening techniques. A subsequent parametrical analysis shows that both techniques produce comparable increments in the load carrying capacity of the masonry bridges when compared to unstrengthened conditions. In addition, it was seen that if the finite friction between blocks is not considered when performing the limit analysis of masonry bridges, the ultimate load capacity of the arches can be overestimated as the failure mode can be attained due to shear sliding of the masonry blocks, a hinge mechanism or a combination of both.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
32_Zampieri et al (2020) ES.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Published (publisher's version)
Licenza: Accesso privato - non pubblico
Dimensione 7.21 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.21 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3383759
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 32
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 25
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact