A crucial aspect of Gilead and colleagues' ontology is the dichotomy between tangible and intangible representations, but the latter remains rather ill-defined. We propose a fundamental role for interoceptive experience and the statistical distribution of entities in language, especially for intangible representations, that we believe Gilead and colleagues' ontology needs to incorporate.
Catching the intangible: A role for emotion?
Montefinese M.
;Ambrosini E.;Visalli A.;
2020
Abstract
A crucial aspect of Gilead and colleagues' ontology is the dichotomy between tangible and intangible representations, but the latter remains rather ill-defined. We propose a fundamental role for interoceptive experience and the statistical distribution of entities in language, especially for intangible representations, that we believe Gilead and colleagues' ontology needs to incorporate.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Montefinese_Commentary for BBS_PrePrint.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Preprint (AM - Author's Manuscript - submitted)
Licenza:
Altro
Dimensione
101.83 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
101.83 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
