Onboard methanol steam reforming (MSR) coupled with proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) is investigated as a pathway for maritime decarbonization. Joule heating, flue-gas heating, and condensing-steam heating of multitubular fixed-bed MSR reactors are compared using steady-state one-dimensional models and technological, economic, environmental, and safety indicators. Selected configurations achieved weighted- average methanol conversions higher than 99%. Joule heating produced inlet cold spots of 442-445 K, whereas condensing steam maintained nearly uniform temperatures of 477-478 K. Within the investigated candidate set, normalized aggregated sustainability indicators ranged from 0.64 to 0.88 for Joule heating, 0.87-0.96 for flue-gas heating, and 0.997-0.999 for condensing steam. Condensing-steam heating attained the highest aggregate ranking across the examined decision-making perspectives and aggregation procedures. These relative indicators are not absolute sustainability levels, and the ranking remains conditional on the investigated steady-state design space, system boundaries, model assumptions, and economic and emission factors.

Sustainability assessment of methanol steam reforming reactors for shipboard coupling with PEM fuel cells

Andriani G.;Vianello C.;Mocellin P.
2026

Abstract

Onboard methanol steam reforming (MSR) coupled with proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) is investigated as a pathway for maritime decarbonization. Joule heating, flue-gas heating, and condensing-steam heating of multitubular fixed-bed MSR reactors are compared using steady-state one-dimensional models and technological, economic, environmental, and safety indicators. Selected configurations achieved weighted- average methanol conversions higher than 99%. Joule heating produced inlet cold spots of 442-445 K, whereas condensing steam maintained nearly uniform temperatures of 477-478 K. Within the investigated candidate set, normalized aggregated sustainability indicators ranged from 0.64 to 0.88 for Joule heating, 0.87-0.96 for flue-gas heating, and 0.997-0.999 for condensing steam. Condensing-steam heating attained the highest aggregate ranking across the examined decision-making perspectives and aggregation procedures. These relative indicators are not absolute sustainability levels, and the ranking remains conditional on the investigated steady-state design space, system boundaries, model assumptions, and economic and emission factors.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3616678
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact