Neural activity encompasses both rhythmic oscillations and aperiodic background dynamics, reflecting complex brain function beyond traditional rhythm-centric views. The aperiodic component, once considered noise, is now recognised as a meaningful signal indicative of excitation-inhibition balance and intrinsic neural timescales. Here, we review advanced signal processing frameworks, including spectral parameterisation and burst detection algorithms, that disentangle these periodic and aperiodic components. We critically evaluate evidence suggesting that aperiodic parameters track neurodevelopment and serve as candidate biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease and Parkinsonism. Furthermore, we highlight how neuroengineering interventions, such as deep brain stimulation and acupuncture, actively modulate these features. Crucially, we address the current methodological heterogeneity in the field, proposing a standardised roadmap for estimation to resolve conflicting interpretations. These findings underscore the complementary roles of oscillatory and aperiodic dynamics, offering novel avenues for closed-loop brain-computer interfaces and personalized neurotherapeutics.

Quantifying fractal and oscillatory components in neural signals for biomarker development

Porcaro C.
;
Bertoldo A.
2026

Abstract

Neural activity encompasses both rhythmic oscillations and aperiodic background dynamics, reflecting complex brain function beyond traditional rhythm-centric views. The aperiodic component, once considered noise, is now recognised as a meaningful signal indicative of excitation-inhibition balance and intrinsic neural timescales. Here, we review advanced signal processing frameworks, including spectral parameterisation and burst detection algorithms, that disentangle these periodic and aperiodic components. We critically evaluate evidence suggesting that aperiodic parameters track neurodevelopment and serve as candidate biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease and Parkinsonism. Furthermore, we highlight how neuroengineering interventions, such as deep brain stimulation and acupuncture, actively modulate these features. Crucially, we address the current methodological heterogeneity in the field, proposing a standardised roadmap for estimation to resolve conflicting interpretations. These findings underscore the complementary roles of oscillatory and aperiodic dynamics, offering novel avenues for closed-loop brain-computer interfaces and personalized neurotherapeutics.
2026
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2026 - Quantifying fractal and oscillatory components in neural signals.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Published (Publisher's Version of Record)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.46 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.46 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3594397
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact