Hydropower plays essential role in Europe's energy landscape, contributing significantly to the continent's renewable power generation mix. However, in the context of global sustainability goals and the accelerating impacts of climate change, there is an urgent need to reassess and enhance the sustainability of hydropower development. This includes not only minimizing social and environmental impacts but also addressing legislative and governance challenges that hinder responsible growth. These dimensions are at the core of the COST Action CA21104 – Pan European Network on Sustainable Hydropower (PEN@Hydropower), which brings together more than 375 members across five working groups spanning technical, environmental, economic, and social perspectives. This paper presents a synthesis of PEN@Hydropower activities, focusing on the underutilization of hydropower potential in four European countries—Slovenia, Lithuania, Poland, and Iceland. These countries, often underrepresented in the literature, offer valuable insights into how multi-level governance and stakeholder dynamics shape the implementation of EU climate and energy policies. Drawing on qualitative methodology research methods within the COST Action CA21104 framework, the study combines in-depth analysis of revised National Energy and Climate Plans (NECPs) with participatory stakeholder mapping based on Reed's methodology (Reed et al., 2009) [23]. The findings reveal a significant legislative gap between EU-level climateneutrality objectives (such as those set out in the European Green Deal) and environmental protection obligations (for example, the Water Framework Directive). This gap permeates governance structures and ultimately constrains hydropower development. The stakeholder workshop held in Reykjavík further confirmed that this misalignment disproportionately affects actors such as civil society, academic experts, and hydropower operators
Action towards increase in sustainable hydropower: A Pan-European assessment and strategy
Cavazzini G.
2026
Abstract
Hydropower plays essential role in Europe's energy landscape, contributing significantly to the continent's renewable power generation mix. However, in the context of global sustainability goals and the accelerating impacts of climate change, there is an urgent need to reassess and enhance the sustainability of hydropower development. This includes not only minimizing social and environmental impacts but also addressing legislative and governance challenges that hinder responsible growth. These dimensions are at the core of the COST Action CA21104 – Pan European Network on Sustainable Hydropower (PEN@Hydropower), which brings together more than 375 members across five working groups spanning technical, environmental, economic, and social perspectives. This paper presents a synthesis of PEN@Hydropower activities, focusing on the underutilization of hydropower potential in four European countries—Slovenia, Lithuania, Poland, and Iceland. These countries, often underrepresented in the literature, offer valuable insights into how multi-level governance and stakeholder dynamics shape the implementation of EU climate and energy policies. Drawing on qualitative methodology research methods within the COST Action CA21104 framework, the study combines in-depth analysis of revised National Energy and Climate Plans (NECPs) with participatory stakeholder mapping based on Reed's methodology (Reed et al., 2009) [23]. The findings reveal a significant legislative gap between EU-level climateneutrality objectives (such as those set out in the European Green Deal) and environmental protection obligations (for example, the Water Framework Directive). This gap permeates governance structures and ultimately constrains hydropower development. The stakeholder workshop held in Reykjavík further confirmed that this misalignment disproportionately affects actors such as civil society, academic experts, and hydropower operatorsPubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




