This study investigates short-term forecasting of carbon emissions from electricity generation in the northern and southern Italian electricity markets. The analysis considers linear parametric models, such as seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA); functional parametric models, including seasonal functional autoregressive (S)FAR and functional autoregressive with exogenous input (SFARX); and nonparametric (possibly nonlinear) models, such as generalised additive models (GAM) and the TBATS model. In addition, forecast combination techniques are explored, incorporating predictions from multiple models through simple averaging, the Bates and Granger (1969) method, and a selection-based approach. Forecast performance is evaluated using hourly root mean squared error (RMSE) over a one-year test period. The results indicate that the functional models consistently achieve the lowest relative RMSE during the early morning hours, whereas the GAM models outperform all others throughout the day, afternoon, and evening. These findings highlight the benefits of forecast combinations, particularly the selection-based approach, which effectively integrates functional and GAM models to improve predictive performance.

Forecasting carbon emissions from electricity generation: classical vs functional methods

Pierdomenico Duttilo
;
Francesco Lisi
2025

Abstract

This study investigates short-term forecasting of carbon emissions from electricity generation in the northern and southern Italian electricity markets. The analysis considers linear parametric models, such as seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA); functional parametric models, including seasonal functional autoregressive (S)FAR and functional autoregressive with exogenous input (SFARX); and nonparametric (possibly nonlinear) models, such as generalised additive models (GAM) and the TBATS model. In addition, forecast combination techniques are explored, incorporating predictions from multiple models through simple averaging, the Bates and Granger (1969) method, and a selection-based approach. Forecast performance is evaluated using hourly root mean squared error (RMSE) over a one-year test period. The results indicate that the functional models consistently achieve the lowest relative RMSE during the early morning hours, whereas the GAM models outperform all others throughout the day, afternoon, and evening. These findings highlight the benefits of forecast combinations, particularly the selection-based approach, which effectively integrates functional and GAM models to improve predictive performance.
2025
IES 2025 Innovation & Society Statistics and Data Science for Evaluation and Quality - BOOK OF SHORT PAPERS
IES 2025 Innovation & Society Statistics and Data Science for Evaluation and Quality
978 88 5495 849 4
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3555299
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact