The cement industry is a major contributor to global CO2 emissions. Among the various decarbonisation strategies, heat demand electrification and carbon capture technologies offer promising solutions for reducing both process- and fuel-related emissions. This study investigates the potential of low-carbon cement plants that combine calciner electrification with amine-based carbon capture on rotary kiln emissions. A techno-economic analysis is conducted on four process alternatives, differing in the type of electrified calciner – entrainment vs. drop tube – and the heat recovery strategy for the hot CO2 produced, in the EU context. The four low-carbon processes are benchmarked against a reference plant without mitigation measures. Drop tube calciner configurations show better energy efficiency than entrainment calciner alternatives although their environmental performance is comparable. When renewable electrical energy is supplied to the plants, the CO2 avoidance rates exceed 98%, making these options competitive with other decarbonisation technologies such as oxyfuel and calcium looping. Economic viability remains challenging under current EU prices and carbon intensity of imported electricity. The entrainment calciner configuration that uses pure CO2 to preheat raw materials emerges as the most favourable, with a cost of avoided CO2 of 217.4 €/tCO2, compared to 231–234 €/tCO2 for the other options. To ensure cost-effectiveness, electricity prices would need to remain below approximately 90 €/MWhel when low-carbon electricity is supplied.

Combined electrification and carbon capture for low-carbon cement: Techno-economic assessment of different designs

Varnier L.;d'Amore F.;Melitos G.;Bezzo F.
2025

Abstract

The cement industry is a major contributor to global CO2 emissions. Among the various decarbonisation strategies, heat demand electrification and carbon capture technologies offer promising solutions for reducing both process- and fuel-related emissions. This study investigates the potential of low-carbon cement plants that combine calciner electrification with amine-based carbon capture on rotary kiln emissions. A techno-economic analysis is conducted on four process alternatives, differing in the type of electrified calciner – entrainment vs. drop tube – and the heat recovery strategy for the hot CO2 produced, in the EU context. The four low-carbon processes are benchmarked against a reference plant without mitigation measures. Drop tube calciner configurations show better energy efficiency than entrainment calciner alternatives although their environmental performance is comparable. When renewable electrical energy is supplied to the plants, the CO2 avoidance rates exceed 98%, making these options competitive with other decarbonisation technologies such as oxyfuel and calcium looping. Economic viability remains challenging under current EU prices and carbon intensity of imported electricity. The entrainment calciner configuration that uses pure CO2 to preheat raw materials emerges as the most favourable, with a cost of avoided CO2 of 217.4 €/tCO2, compared to 231–234 €/tCO2 for the other options. To ensure cost-effectiveness, electricity prices would need to remain below approximately 90 €/MWhel when low-carbon electricity is supplied.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3549320
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact