Purpose: To assess the survival outcomes of adjuvant radiation therapy (aRT) versus observation with or without early salvage RT (Obs±esRT) for cN0M0 pN1 PCa and to create a model for clinical decision making. Materials and methods: We retrospectively identified 1,103 patients with cN0M0 PCa with pN1 PCa after surgery ( 2000-2021) at 18 referral centers. Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox proportional hazards were used. Results: Overall, 670 (61%) had ISUP 4-5 and the median number of positive nodes was 1. On multivariable analyses, ≥3 positive nodes (HR 2.03,95% CI 1.22-3.37; p=0.006) and ISUP 5 (HR 1.92,95% CI 1.15-3.18; p=0.01) were associated with an increased all-cause mortality. Based on pT stage, ISUP and positive nodes, a two risk categories model was created. In men undergoing observation, seven years disease-free survival was 27% (95%CI 20.4-36) for low-intermediate and 11% (95%CI 6.7-17) for high risk patients; aRT had higher OS rates in the high-risk group (92%;95%CI 87-96 vs observation 84%, 95%CI 77-90; p=0.006). In interaction term analyses aRT confirmed its protective effect on mortality in high risk patients (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09-0.84, p=0.024). Results were comparable when excluding men with PSA persistence. Conclusions: In cN0M0 pN+ PCa, aRT yields a survival benefit compared to Obs±esRT only in men with a high risk disease based on unfavorable prognostic factors. We created a risk model to guide clinical decision making in this setting.

Adjuvant radiation therapy or observation with or without early salvage radiation therapy for men with node positive prostate cancer after surgery and negative pre-operative conventional imaging: a multicenter study

Zattoni, Fabio;Moro, Fabrizio Dal;
2025

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the survival outcomes of adjuvant radiation therapy (aRT) versus observation with or without early salvage RT (Obs±esRT) for cN0M0 pN1 PCa and to create a model for clinical decision making. Materials and methods: We retrospectively identified 1,103 patients with cN0M0 PCa with pN1 PCa after surgery ( 2000-2021) at 18 referral centers. Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox proportional hazards were used. Results: Overall, 670 (61%) had ISUP 4-5 and the median number of positive nodes was 1. On multivariable analyses, ≥3 positive nodes (HR 2.03,95% CI 1.22-3.37; p=0.006) and ISUP 5 (HR 1.92,95% CI 1.15-3.18; p=0.01) were associated with an increased all-cause mortality. Based on pT stage, ISUP and positive nodes, a two risk categories model was created. In men undergoing observation, seven years disease-free survival was 27% (95%CI 20.4-36) for low-intermediate and 11% (95%CI 6.7-17) for high risk patients; aRT had higher OS rates in the high-risk group (92%;95%CI 87-96 vs observation 84%, 95%CI 77-90; p=0.006). In interaction term analyses aRT confirmed its protective effect on mortality in high risk patients (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09-0.84, p=0.024). Results were comparable when excluding men with PSA persistence. Conclusions: In cN0M0 pN+ PCa, aRT yields a survival benefit compared to Obs±esRT only in men with a high risk disease based on unfavorable prognostic factors. We created a risk model to guide clinical decision making in this setting.
2025
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3547785
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex 2
social impact