Multi-objective optimisation is drawing more and more attention in the organic Rankine cycle research field due to its comprehensiveness in demonstrating optimum results from multiple perspectives. For this reason, a comparative two-objective optimisation is performed on a combined organic Rankine cycle system liquefied with geothermal among three typical distribution pressures: 1 MPa, 4 MPa and 7 MPa. Eight operational parameters, 11 working fluids, and 16 possible configurations are included during optimisation. The optimisation result is divided and analysed on the basis of the thermodynamic weight (W 1). The results reveal that the recuperative organic Rankine cycle configuration is preferred when W1 is higher, while the basic organic Rankine cycle configuration is preferred when W 1 is lower. Two typical cases are further analysed in detail: the balanced case (W 1 = 0.5) and the maximum case (W 1 = 1). The system is able to yield the maximum energy efficiency of 32.78% with the working fluid Propane under the maximum case with a distribution pressure of 1 MPa. Compared to the maximum case, the balanced case is capable of achieving considerable economic benefits while incurring minimal thermodynamic losses. When the distribution pressure is 7 MPa, the balanced case can achieve as much as 82.94% of the energy efficiency compared to the maximum case, requiring only 44.17% of the electricity production cost.

Multi-objective optimisation of a geothermal-liquefied natural gas combined organic Rankine cycle system under different distribution pressures

Zhang, Han;Cavazzini, Giovanna;Zanetti, Giacomo;Benato, Alberto
2025

Abstract

Multi-objective optimisation is drawing more and more attention in the organic Rankine cycle research field due to its comprehensiveness in demonstrating optimum results from multiple perspectives. For this reason, a comparative two-objective optimisation is performed on a combined organic Rankine cycle system liquefied with geothermal among three typical distribution pressures: 1 MPa, 4 MPa and 7 MPa. Eight operational parameters, 11 working fluids, and 16 possible configurations are included during optimisation. The optimisation result is divided and analysed on the basis of the thermodynamic weight (W 1). The results reveal that the recuperative organic Rankine cycle configuration is preferred when W1 is higher, while the basic organic Rankine cycle configuration is preferred when W 1 is lower. Two typical cases are further analysed in detail: the balanced case (W 1 = 0.5) and the maximum case (W 1 = 1). The system is able to yield the maximum energy efficiency of 32.78% with the working fluid Propane under the maximum case with a distribution pressure of 1 MPa. Compared to the maximum case, the balanced case is capable of achieving considerable economic benefits while incurring minimal thermodynamic losses. When the distribution pressure is 7 MPa, the balanced case can achieve as much as 82.94% of the energy efficiency compared to the maximum case, requiring only 44.17% of the electricity production cost.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0196890425000779-main.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Published (publisher's version)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.46 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.46 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3546839
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact