This paper presents a hybrid approach that inte- grates the YOLO architecture for the detection of hepatocyte nuclei and the SAM for the segmentation of these cellular structures. This hybrid approach aims to facilitate and improve the task of quantification and morphometry analysis of cells in histopathological images, thereby providing researchers with a tool for automating their analysis without significant statistical difference from manual annotation. Three different versions of the YOLO model were tested: YOLOv3, YOLOv8, and YOLOv9. They achieved an AP of 70.28%, 70.98%, and 71.5% respectively. In terms of precision and recall, YOLOv3 achieved 90.7% and 92.4%, YOLOv8 achieved 90.4% and 92.94%, and YOLOv9 achieved 92.16% and 93.66%. According to the paired t-test, none of the YOLO models showed a significant statistical difference compared to human annotation. For morphometry analysis, we evaluated the default SAM and the fine-tuned models MED-SAM and Micro-SAM. The best results were obtained by the default SAM model, with a Dice coefficient of 93.65% and an IOU of 88.2%.

Nuclei Segmentation in Hepatocytes Using YOLO and SAM

Nanni, Loris
;
2024

Abstract

This paper presents a hybrid approach that inte- grates the YOLO architecture for the detection of hepatocyte nuclei and the SAM for the segmentation of these cellular structures. This hybrid approach aims to facilitate and improve the task of quantification and morphometry analysis of cells in histopathological images, thereby providing researchers with a tool for automating their analysis without significant statistical difference from manual annotation. Three different versions of the YOLO model were tested: YOLOv3, YOLOv8, and YOLOv9. They achieved an AP of 70.28%, 70.98%, and 71.5% respectively. In terms of precision and recall, YOLOv3 achieved 90.7% and 92.4%, YOLOv8 achieved 90.4% and 92.94%, and YOLOv9 achieved 92.16% and 93.66%. According to the paired t-test, none of the YOLO models showed a significant statistical difference compared to human annotation. For morphometry analysis, we evaluated the default SAM and the fine-tuned models MED-SAM and Micro-SAM. The best results were obtained by the default SAM model, with a Dice coefficient of 93.65% and an IOU of 88.2%.
2024
International Conference on Systems, Signals, and Image Processing
31st International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing, IWSSIP 2024
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3541839
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact