Aims: Low QRS Voltages (LQRSV) in limb leads and QRS fragmentation (FQRS) are possible electrocardiographic signs of myocardial fibrosis and cardiomyopathy, but they are not listed in current criteria for interpretating athlete's ECG. We investigated the prevalence and determinants of LQRSV and FQRS in a cohort of young apparently healthy athletes undergoing preparticipation screening (PPS). Methods: We analysed a consecutive series of 2140 ECG obtained during PPS of young athletes (mean age 12.5±2.6 years, 7-18 year-old, 49% males). The peak-to-peak QRS voltage was measured in all limb leads and LQRSV were defined when maximum value was <0.5 mV. Fragmented QRS morphologies were grouped into five patterns. Lead aVR was not considered. Results: Maximum peak-to-peak QRS voltage in limb leads was 1.4±0.4 mV, similar between younger and older athletes, but significantly lower in females than males (1.35±0.38mV vs 1.45±0.42mV; p<0.001). There was a weak correlation between maximal QRS voltages and body mass index (BMI), but not with type of sport or training load. Only 5 (0.2%) individuals showed LQRSV. At least one fragmented QRS complex was identified in 831 (39%) individuals but excluding the rSr' pattern in V1-V2, only 10 (0.5%) showed FQRS in ≥2 contiguous leads. They were older than those without FQRS, but did not differ in terms of gender, BMI, type of sport or training load. Conclusions: LQRSV in limb leads and FQRSV in ≥2 contiguous leads excluding V1-V2 are rare in young apparently healthy athletes and are not related to the type and intensity of sport activity. Therefore, they may require additional testing to rule out an underlying disease particularly when other abnormalities are present.

Prevalence and determinants of low QRS voltages and QRS fragmentation in children and adolescents undergoing sports preparticipation screening

Graziano, Francesca;Corrado, Domenico;Zorzi, Alessandro
2024

Abstract

Aims: Low QRS Voltages (LQRSV) in limb leads and QRS fragmentation (FQRS) are possible electrocardiographic signs of myocardial fibrosis and cardiomyopathy, but they are not listed in current criteria for interpretating athlete's ECG. We investigated the prevalence and determinants of LQRSV and FQRS in a cohort of young apparently healthy athletes undergoing preparticipation screening (PPS). Methods: We analysed a consecutive series of 2140 ECG obtained during PPS of young athletes (mean age 12.5±2.6 years, 7-18 year-old, 49% males). The peak-to-peak QRS voltage was measured in all limb leads and LQRSV were defined when maximum value was <0.5 mV. Fragmented QRS morphologies were grouped into five patterns. Lead aVR was not considered. Results: Maximum peak-to-peak QRS voltage in limb leads was 1.4±0.4 mV, similar between younger and older athletes, but significantly lower in females than males (1.35±0.38mV vs 1.45±0.42mV; p<0.001). There was a weak correlation between maximal QRS voltages and body mass index (BMI), but not with type of sport or training load. Only 5 (0.2%) individuals showed LQRSV. At least one fragmented QRS complex was identified in 831 (39%) individuals but excluding the rSr' pattern in V1-V2, only 10 (0.5%) showed FQRS in ≥2 contiguous leads. They were older than those without FQRS, but did not differ in terms of gender, BMI, type of sport or training load. Conclusions: LQRSV in limb leads and FQRSV in ≥2 contiguous leads excluding V1-V2 are rare in young apparently healthy athletes and are not related to the type and intensity of sport activity. Therefore, they may require additional testing to rule out an underlying disease particularly when other abnormalities are present.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3514025
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact