In a world of borders, the Internet has no borders. This is one of the reasons why the need for cross-border gathering of e-evidence is increasingly frequent. The article is aimed at identifying the legal instruments for cross-border collecting of e-evidence. For this purpose, the main legal sources of the European Union and the Council of Europe are analysed. Furthermore, the article is aimed at providing the reader with a roadmap for orientation in this matter. In this perspective, the following hypotheses are analysed: 1) The collection of publicly available e-evidence or for which there is consent to the collection and the relationship of these investigations with Article 32 of the Budapest Convention; 2) The collection of e-evidence with direct request to service providers based on the Second Additional Protocol to the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime of the Council of Europe, and the Regulation on European Production and Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal matters; 3) The gathering of e-evidence on the basis of bilateral and/or multilateral agreements; 4) The gathering of e-evidence according to the European Investigation Order in criminal matters (EIO); and 5) The gathering of e- evidence in states where EIO does not apply.

Cross-Border Gathering of E-Evidence: Different Legal Frameworks in European Union and Council of Europe.

Signorato Silvia
2023

Abstract

In a world of borders, the Internet has no borders. This is one of the reasons why the need for cross-border gathering of e-evidence is increasingly frequent. The article is aimed at identifying the legal instruments for cross-border collecting of e-evidence. For this purpose, the main legal sources of the European Union and the Council of Europe are analysed. Furthermore, the article is aimed at providing the reader with a roadmap for orientation in this matter. In this perspective, the following hypotheses are analysed: 1) The collection of publicly available e-evidence or for which there is consent to the collection and the relationship of these investigations with Article 32 of the Budapest Convention; 2) The collection of e-evidence with direct request to service providers based on the Second Additional Protocol to the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime of the Council of Europe, and the Regulation on European Production and Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal matters; 3) The gathering of e-evidence on the basis of bilateral and/or multilateral agreements; 4) The gathering of e-evidence according to the European Investigation Order in criminal matters (EIO); and 5) The gathering of e- evidence in states where EIO does not apply.
2023
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3512593
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact