Different forms of deception can be applied to hide one’s true intentions; this faking can take various forms, depending on the deceiver’s aim(s): faking bad or faking good. Since 25-45% of behaviors are deceptive in a legal setting, detecting these ef-forts has become a priority. With this aim, the development of objective and effective tools has increased considerably. Starting with the first polygraph created by Vittorio Benussi in 1914 to nowadays through the implementation of Artificial Intelligence, we will explore the lie detection techniques that have followed over the years.
Deception in Court
Giuseppe Sartori;Giulia Melis
2022
Abstract
Different forms of deception can be applied to hide one’s true intentions; this faking can take various forms, depending on the deceiver’s aim(s): faking bad or faking good. Since 25-45% of behaviors are deceptive in a legal setting, detecting these ef-forts has become a priority. With this aim, the development of objective and effective tools has increased considerably. Starting with the first polygraph created by Vittorio Benussi in 1914 to nowadays through the implementation of Artificial Intelligence, we will explore the lie detection techniques that have followed over the years.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Deception in Court.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Published (publisher's version)
Licenza:
Accesso privato - non pubblico
Dimensione
408.84 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
408.84 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.