Sarcopenia is a muscle disease listed within the ICD‐10 classification. Several operational definitions have been created for sarcopenia screening; however, an international consensus is lacking. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have recently recognized that sarcopenia detection requires improved diagnosis and screening measures. Mounting evidence hints towards changes in the corticospinal communication system where corticomuscular coherence (CMC) reflects an effective mechanism of corticospinal interaction. CMC can be assessed during locomotion by means of simultaneously measuring Electroencephalography (EEG) and Electromyography (EMG). The aim of this study was to perform sarcopenia screening in community‐dwelling older adults and explore the possibility of using CMC assessed during gait to discriminate between sarcopenic and non‐sarcopenic older adults. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves showed high sensitivity, precision and accuracy of CMC assessed from EEG Cz sensor and EMG sensors located over Musculus Vastus Medialis [Cz‐VM; AUC (95.0%CI): 0.98 (0.92–1.04), sensitivity: 1.00, 1‐specificity: 0.89, p < 0.001] and with Musculus Biceps Femoris [Cz‐BF; AUC (95.0%CI): 0.86 (0.68–1.03), sensitivity: 1.00, 1‐specificity: 0.70, p < 0.001]. These muscles showed significant differences with large magnitude of effect between sarcopenic and non‐sarcopenic older adults [Hedge’s g (95.0%CI): 2.2 (1.3–3.1), p = 0.005 and Hedge’s g (95.0%CI): 1.5 (0.7–2.2), p = 0.010; respectively]. The novelty of this exploratory investigation is the hint toward a novel possible determinant of age‐related sarcopenia, derived from corticospinal control of locomotion and shown by the observed large differences in CMC when sarcopenic and non‐sarcopenic older adults are compared. This, in turn, might represent in future a potential treatment target to counteract sarcopenia as well as a parameter to monitor the progression of the disease and/or the potential recovery following other treatment interventions.
Corticospinal control of human locomotion as a new determinant of age‐related sarcopenia: An exploratory study
Gennaro F.
;
2020
Abstract
Sarcopenia is a muscle disease listed within the ICD‐10 classification. Several operational definitions have been created for sarcopenia screening; however, an international consensus is lacking. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have recently recognized that sarcopenia detection requires improved diagnosis and screening measures. Mounting evidence hints towards changes in the corticospinal communication system where corticomuscular coherence (CMC) reflects an effective mechanism of corticospinal interaction. CMC can be assessed during locomotion by means of simultaneously measuring Electroencephalography (EEG) and Electromyography (EMG). The aim of this study was to perform sarcopenia screening in community‐dwelling older adults and explore the possibility of using CMC assessed during gait to discriminate between sarcopenic and non‐sarcopenic older adults. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves showed high sensitivity, precision and accuracy of CMC assessed from EEG Cz sensor and EMG sensors located over Musculus Vastus Medialis [Cz‐VM; AUC (95.0%CI): 0.98 (0.92–1.04), sensitivity: 1.00, 1‐specificity: 0.89, p < 0.001] and with Musculus Biceps Femoris [Cz‐BF; AUC (95.0%CI): 0.86 (0.68–1.03), sensitivity: 1.00, 1‐specificity: 0.70, p < 0.001]. These muscles showed significant differences with large magnitude of effect between sarcopenic and non‐sarcopenic older adults [Hedge’s g (95.0%CI): 2.2 (1.3–3.1), p = 0.005 and Hedge’s g (95.0%CI): 1.5 (0.7–2.2), p = 0.010; respectively]. The novelty of this exploratory investigation is the hint toward a novel possible determinant of age‐related sarcopenia, derived from corticospinal control of locomotion and shown by the observed large differences in CMC when sarcopenic and non‐sarcopenic older adults are compared. This, in turn, might represent in future a potential treatment target to counteract sarcopenia as well as a parameter to monitor the progression of the disease and/or the potential recovery following other treatment interventions.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
jcm-09-00720-v3.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Published (publisher's version)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
2.12 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.12 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.