The topic of the paper is the relationship between scientific knowledge and legal practice. The claim is that an epistemological transformation takes place in trial, through which scientific categories are reshaped according to the goals of the jurisdiction. Doxa, that is, opinion, provides the ground for this transformation, thanks to its own epistemological and methodological features that are functional to the purpose of trial. This claim is supported, on the theoretical level, by calling into play Aristotle’s ‘Rhetoric’, and on the practical level by rereading the well-known and widely debated Daubert case

L’endossalità dei saperi esperti. Rileggere Daubert attraverso Aristotele

Stefano Fuselli
2022

Abstract

The topic of the paper is the relationship between scientific knowledge and legal practice. The claim is that an epistemological transformation takes place in trial, through which scientific categories are reshaped according to the goals of the jurisdiction. Doxa, that is, opinion, provides the ground for this transformation, thanks to its own epistemological and methodological features that are functional to the purpose of trial. This claim is supported, on the theoretical level, by calling into play Aristotle’s ‘Rhetoric’, and on the practical level by rereading the well-known and widely debated Daubert case
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JELT 2022-2-05.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Published (publisher's version)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 197.09 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
197.09 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3462525
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact