Formally describing and assessing the difficulty of learning and teaching material is important for quality assurance in university teaching, for aligning teaching and learning activities, and for easing communications among stakeholders such as teachers and students. We propose a novel taxonomy to describe and quantify the difficulty levels of exam questions and exercises encountered in engineering-related contexts, together with its development and piloting processes. The taxonomy consists of two dimensions which separately and independently describe the difficulty in understanding / explaining and using / applying a content unit. The piloting phase included 10 purposefully selected experts in the field of control engineering, external to the project, that tested its performance, utility, ease of use, and clarity. The results indicate that the users were able to provide consistent and coherent assessments of the difficulty levels of 15 selected exam questions. The paper further discusses suggestions for improvement voiced by the participants in order to promote an even more consistent and coherent assessment of engineering students' mastery of the subject.
Assessing engineering exercises: a novel taxonomy
Marica LiotinoWriting – Original Draft Preparation
;Damiano VaragnoloWriting – Review & Editing
;Monica FedeliSupervision
2022
Abstract
Formally describing and assessing the difficulty of learning and teaching material is important for quality assurance in university teaching, for aligning teaching and learning activities, and for easing communications among stakeholders such as teachers and students. We propose a novel taxonomy to describe and quantify the difficulty levels of exam questions and exercises encountered in engineering-related contexts, together with its development and piloting processes. The taxonomy consists of two dimensions which separately and independently describe the difficulty in understanding / explaining and using / applying a content unit. The piloting phase included 10 purposefully selected experts in the field of control engineering, external to the project, that tested its performance, utility, ease of use, and clarity. The results indicate that the users were able to provide consistent and coherent assessments of the difficulty levels of 15 selected exam questions. The paper further discusses suggestions for improvement voiced by the participants in order to promote an even more consistent and coherent assessment of engineering students' mastery of the subject.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
0029_FI.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Published (publisher's version)
Licenza:
Accesso libero
Dimensione
171.34 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
171.34 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Assessing-engineering-exercises--a-novel-taxonomy_2022_IFAC-PapersOnLine.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Published (publisher's version)
Licenza:
Accesso libero
Dimensione
385.17 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
385.17 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.