Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine which of the most commonly used flaps restore contour more accurately in mandibular body reconstructions using conformance analyses and virtual measurements. Methods: Using normal computed tomography (CT) scans and a 3D software, mandibular body defects were virtually created. “Single shot” and osteotomized fibula flaps (SS-FF and O-FF), iliac crest flaps (ICF) and scapular tip flaps (STF) were digitally harvested and coregistered to reconstruct those defects. Conformance analyses were performed by calculating the root mean square (RMS) for overall and contour conformance. Results: Ten patients normal CT scans were included. The STF demonstrated improved overall conformance compared with the ICF, the SS-FF and the O-FF (RMS = 2.03 mm vs 4.53 mm vs 2.76 vs 2.37 mm, respectively; p<.001). Similar trends were seen for contour conformance in STF compared with the ICF and the SS-FF (RMS = 2.48 mm vs 4.50 mm vs 3.28 mm, respectively), whereas the O-FF performed better than STF (RMS = 1.85 mm vs 2.48 mm; p<.001). Conclusions: The osseous component of the STF resembles the mandibular body more accurately than the one in the ICF and FF without the need for an osteotomy. Future clinical studies can help to elucidate the clinical impact of these virtual findings.
Comparing Contour Restoration of Mandibular Body Defects With Fibula, Iliac Crest, and Scapular Tip Flaps: A Conformance Virtual Study
Ferrari M.;
2021
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine which of the most commonly used flaps restore contour more accurately in mandibular body reconstructions using conformance analyses and virtual measurements. Methods: Using normal computed tomography (CT) scans and a 3D software, mandibular body defects were virtually created. “Single shot” and osteotomized fibula flaps (SS-FF and O-FF), iliac crest flaps (ICF) and scapular tip flaps (STF) were digitally harvested and coregistered to reconstruct those defects. Conformance analyses were performed by calculating the root mean square (RMS) for overall and contour conformance. Results: Ten patients normal CT scans were included. The STF demonstrated improved overall conformance compared with the ICF, the SS-FF and the O-FF (RMS = 2.03 mm vs 4.53 mm vs 2.76 vs 2.37 mm, respectively; p<.001). Similar trends were seen for contour conformance in STF compared with the ICF and the SS-FF (RMS = 2.48 mm vs 4.50 mm vs 3.28 mm, respectively), whereas the O-FF performed better than STF (RMS = 1.85 mm vs 2.48 mm; p<.001). Conclusions: The osseous component of the STF resembles the mandibular body more accurately than the one in the ICF and FF without the need for an osteotomy. Future clinical studies can help to elucidate the clinical impact of these virtual findings.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S0278239120315299-main.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Postprint (accepted version)
Licenza:
Accesso privato - non pubblico
Dimensione
2.4 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.4 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.