Purpose: To assess the feasibility and the results of Bortezomib-based treatment of “high-risk” AL-amyloidosis patients in a hematology ward. Methods: We report on 52 high-risk amyloidosis patients treated with first-line bortezomib-based chemotherapy. Results: At day 30 from the beginning of the therapy, 23 patients (44%) achieved a hematological response (complete response plus very good partial response); 14 patients (27%) achieved a partial response; 15 patients (29%) were non-responders. After a median follow-up of 28.5 months, the survival rates were 18/23 (78%) for responders; 9/14 (64%) for partial responders and 3/15 (20%) for nonresponders with a median overall survival of 43, 24 and 11 months, respectively (log-rank test: P < .001). NHYA class I-II, NTproBNP < 6500 ng/L, the hematologic response, and the partial hematological response at day 30 independently predicted the survival. There has been no significant difference (P = .173) in survival between revised Mayo stage III and IV patients although there was a trend toward a better prognosis for Mayo stage III. A suboptimal hematological response at day 30 allowed a later organ response in 12/14 patients (85%) even without therapy change and no modification of the hematological status. Conclusions: These results show that high-risk AL-amyloidosis patients can be managed safely and effectively in a hematology ward. A partial hematologic response may herald a later better response, organ response, and can allow a subsequent second-line therapy and a good survival.

Dealing With High-Risk AL Amyloidosis Patients: A Single Hematologic Center Experience

Riva M.;Cipriani A.;Fedrigo M.;Noventa F.;Adami F.
2021

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the feasibility and the results of Bortezomib-based treatment of “high-risk” AL-amyloidosis patients in a hematology ward. Methods: We report on 52 high-risk amyloidosis patients treated with first-line bortezomib-based chemotherapy. Results: At day 30 from the beginning of the therapy, 23 patients (44%) achieved a hematological response (complete response plus very good partial response); 14 patients (27%) achieved a partial response; 15 patients (29%) were non-responders. After a median follow-up of 28.5 months, the survival rates were 18/23 (78%) for responders; 9/14 (64%) for partial responders and 3/15 (20%) for nonresponders with a median overall survival of 43, 24 and 11 months, respectively (log-rank test: P < .001). NHYA class I-II, NTproBNP < 6500 ng/L, the hematologic response, and the partial hematological response at day 30 independently predicted the survival. There has been no significant difference (P = .173) in survival between revised Mayo stage III and IV patients although there was a trend toward a better prognosis for Mayo stage III. A suboptimal hematological response at day 30 allowed a later organ response in 12/14 patients (85%) even without therapy change and no modification of the hematological status. Conclusions: These results show that high-risk AL-amyloidosis patients can be managed safely and effectively in a hematology ward. A partial hematologic response may herald a later better response, organ response, and can allow a subsequent second-line therapy and a good survival.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S2152265021002858-main-2.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Published (publisher's version)
Licenza: Accesso privato - non pubblico
Dimensione 393.68 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
393.68 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3400686
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact