Background: The parapharyngeal space (PPS) can harbor a variety of tumors that can be approached through a wide spectrum of surgical routes. A decisional algorithm on the surgical approach to resect PPS lesions was tested in terms of reliability by retrospectively applying it to a large series of patients. Methods: Patients treated at the Unit of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery of the University of Brescia, Italy, for tumor or tumor-like lesions involving the PPS between October 1986 and July 2019 were included in the retrospective analysis. Tumor characteristics, clinical presentation, diagnostic work-up, type of resection, surgical approach, and oncologic and morbidity outcomes were reviewed. Reliability of the algorithm was calculated as the number of cases in which the expected approach was confirmed/total number of cases × 100. Results: The analysis included 153 patients. Most lesions (64.1%) were benign. The most frequent complaint at presentation was unilateral oropharyngeal medialization (47.1%), followed by neck/parotid swelling (41.2%). Ninety-two (61.3%) lesions were excised through an enucleation/extracapsular dissection. Wide-margin resection and compartmental resection were performed in 17 (11.3%) and 41 (27.3%) patients, respectively. A single-corridor approach was employed in 132 (87.4%) cases. Combinations of multiple corridors were adopted in 19 (12.6%) patients. Reliability of the decision-making algorithm was 91.2%. Capsular integrity and margin status affected prognosis of pleomorphic adenomas and PPS malignancies, respectively. Conclusion: The proposed decision-making algorithm can reliably guide approach selection, which should primarily aim at ensuring intact-capsule excision of benign lesions suspicious for pleomorphic adenomas and clear-margins resection of PPS malignancies.

Selection of the surgical approach for lesions with parapharyngeal space involvement: A single-center experience on 153 cases

Ferrari M.;Taboni S.;Nicolai P.
2020

Abstract

Background: The parapharyngeal space (PPS) can harbor a variety of tumors that can be approached through a wide spectrum of surgical routes. A decisional algorithm on the surgical approach to resect PPS lesions was tested in terms of reliability by retrospectively applying it to a large series of patients. Methods: Patients treated at the Unit of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery of the University of Brescia, Italy, for tumor or tumor-like lesions involving the PPS between October 1986 and July 2019 were included in the retrospective analysis. Tumor characteristics, clinical presentation, diagnostic work-up, type of resection, surgical approach, and oncologic and morbidity outcomes were reviewed. Reliability of the algorithm was calculated as the number of cases in which the expected approach was confirmed/total number of cases × 100. Results: The analysis included 153 patients. Most lesions (64.1%) were benign. The most frequent complaint at presentation was unilateral oropharyngeal medialization (47.1%), followed by neck/parotid swelling (41.2%). Ninety-two (61.3%) lesions were excised through an enucleation/extracapsular dissection. Wide-margin resection and compartmental resection were performed in 17 (11.3%) and 41 (27.3%) patients, respectively. A single-corridor approach was employed in 132 (87.4%) cases. Combinations of multiple corridors were adopted in 19 (12.6%) patients. Reliability of the decision-making algorithm was 91.2%. Capsular integrity and margin status affected prognosis of pleomorphic adenomas and PPS malignancies, respectively. Conclusion: The proposed decision-making algorithm can reliably guide approach selection, which should primarily aim at ensuring intact-capsule excision of benign lesions suspicious for pleomorphic adenomas and clear-margins resection of PPS malignancies.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3379804
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact