Eye-blink is a sensitive index of cognitive load and some studies have reported that it can be a useful cue for detecting deception. However, it is difficult to apply in the real forensic scenario as very complex techniques to record eye blinking are usually needed (e.g., electrooculography, eye tracker technology). In this paper, we propose a new approach to automatically detect eye blinking based on a computer vision algorithm, which does not require any expensive technology to record data. Results demonstrated that the automatic blink detector reached an accuracy similar to the electrooculogram in detecting the blink rate. Moreover, the automatic blink detector was applied to 68 videos of people who were lying or telling the truth about a past holiday, testing the difference between the two groups in terms of blink rate and response timing. Training machine learning classification models on these features, an accuracy up to 70% in identifying liars and truth-tellers was obtained.
Using blink rate to detect deception: A study to validate an automatic blink detector and a new dataset of videos from liars and truth-tellers
Merylin Monaro
;Pasquale Capuozzo;Federica Ragucci;Antonio Maffei;Antonietta Curci;Cristina Scarpazza;Alessandro Angrilli;Giuseppe Sartori
2020
Abstract
Eye-blink is a sensitive index of cognitive load and some studies have reported that it can be a useful cue for detecting deception. However, it is difficult to apply in the real forensic scenario as very complex techniques to record eye blinking are usually needed (e.g., electrooculography, eye tracker technology). In this paper, we propose a new approach to automatically detect eye blinking based on a computer vision algorithm, which does not require any expensive technology to record data. Results demonstrated that the automatic blink detector reached an accuracy similar to the electrooculogram in detecting the blink rate. Moreover, the automatic blink detector was applied to 68 videos of people who were lying or telling the truth about a past holiday, testing the difference between the two groups in terms of blink rate and response timing. Training machine learning classification models on these features, an accuracy up to 70% in identifying liars and truth-tellers was obtained.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Monaro2020_Chapter_UsingBlinkRateToDetectDeceptio.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Published (Publisher's Version of Record)
Licenza:
Accesso gratuito
Dimensione
776.3 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
776.3 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.