Introduction: Osteoarthritis (OA) is characterised by synovial joint pain, functional disability and affects ∼13 % of people worldwide, of which ∼16–27 % report Knee-OA (KOA). Glucosamine (Glu) is the most widely used nutraceutical treatment for OA despite a lack of scientific consensus, therefore alternative nutraceutical treatments are required. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Lithothamnion species, seawater-derived magnesium and pine bark (Aq+) on pain, symptoms and improve physical function in symptomatic (sKOA), compared to Glu. Methods: 358 participants were screened. In a double-blinded crossover pilot-trial, sKOA participant (n = 30) were randomly assigned to either the Glu group (2000 mg day−1) or Aq+ (3056 mg day−1) for 12 weeks (clinicaltrials.gov:NCT03106584). The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score was used to assess subjective pain and symptoms. Timed-up-and-Go (TuG) and Six minute walking distance were used to assess functional change and analgesic use was recorded. Results: Aq+ improved pain, with a large effect (P < 0.01, d’ = 0.73, 95 %CI 0.201–1.265) and no change for Glu (d’ = 0.38, P = 0.06). Only Aq+ improved pain (P < 0.05) for males (d’ = 0.91, 95 %CI 0.162–1.667) and females (d’ = 0.55, 95 %CI 0.210–1.299). In females, Aq+ improved TuG by −7.02 % (d’ = 0.92, 95 %CI 1.699–0.141) while Glu worsened performance by 4.18 % (P = 0.04). Aq+ reduced analgesia by 71.6 %, compared to Glu (P = 0.02; d’ = 0.82, 95 %CI 1.524–0.123). Aq+ was superior to Glu at improving pain, KOOS subscales, physical function and analgesia use in mild-sKOA. Given these data, Aq+ should be considered as a supplementary treatment for early-stage-KOA and may have the potential to reduce use of pain medication, although larger replication studies are required.

Mineral rich algae with pine bark improved pain, physical function and analgesic use in mild-knee joint osteoarthritis, compared to Glucosamine: A randomized controlled pilot trial

De Vito G.
2020

Abstract

Introduction: Osteoarthritis (OA) is characterised by synovial joint pain, functional disability and affects ∼13 % of people worldwide, of which ∼16–27 % report Knee-OA (KOA). Glucosamine (Glu) is the most widely used nutraceutical treatment for OA despite a lack of scientific consensus, therefore alternative nutraceutical treatments are required. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Lithothamnion species, seawater-derived magnesium and pine bark (Aq+) on pain, symptoms and improve physical function in symptomatic (sKOA), compared to Glu. Methods: 358 participants were screened. In a double-blinded crossover pilot-trial, sKOA participant (n = 30) were randomly assigned to either the Glu group (2000 mg day−1) or Aq+ (3056 mg day−1) for 12 weeks (clinicaltrials.gov:NCT03106584). The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score was used to assess subjective pain and symptoms. Timed-up-and-Go (TuG) and Six minute walking distance were used to assess functional change and analgesic use was recorded. Results: Aq+ improved pain, with a large effect (P < 0.01, d’ = 0.73, 95 %CI 0.201–1.265) and no change for Glu (d’ = 0.38, P = 0.06). Only Aq+ improved pain (P < 0.05) for males (d’ = 0.91, 95 %CI 0.162–1.667) and females (d’ = 0.55, 95 %CI 0.210–1.299). In females, Aq+ improved TuG by −7.02 % (d’ = 0.92, 95 %CI 1.699–0.141) while Glu worsened performance by 4.18 % (P = 0.04). Aq+ reduced analgesia by 71.6 %, compared to Glu (P = 0.02; d’ = 0.82, 95 %CI 1.524–0.123). Aq+ was superior to Glu at improving pain, KOOS subscales, physical function and analgesia use in mild-sKOA. Given these data, Aq+ should be considered as a supplementary treatment for early-stage-KOA and may have the potential to reduce use of pain medication, although larger replication studies are required.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3335810
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact