This note aims to offer an insightful reading about the decision of the european court of justice in case confédération paysanne v. Ministre de l’agriculture (c-528/16). It focuses on the reasons why the court extended the security measures provided by dir. Ce 2001/18 even to some new methods of mutagenesis; techniques used to make certain rape varieties herbicide-tolerant. In particular, this writing would highlight how the court used the precautionary principle to offer some a new guidance for the interpretation of this directive, such as for the other regulations related to the gmo discipline.
Tecniche "nuove", obblighi "nuovi"? La CGUE in una «riscrittura giudiziaria» della direttiva n. 18/2001/CE. Nota a Confédération Paysanne v. Ministre de l'Agriculture (C-528/16)
spiller, elisa
2019
Abstract
This note aims to offer an insightful reading about the decision of the european court of justice in case confédération paysanne v. Ministre de l’agriculture (c-528/16). It focuses on the reasons why the court extended the security measures provided by dir. Ce 2001/18 even to some new methods of mutagenesis; techniques used to make certain rape varieties herbicide-tolerant. In particular, this writing would highlight how the court used the precautionary principle to offer some a new guidance for the interpretation of this directive, such as for the other regulations related to the gmo discipline.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
376-754-1-SM.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Nota a sentenza
Tipologia:
Published (publisher's version)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
349.76 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
349.76 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.