The Implicit Association Test (IAT) and the Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT) are the most common procedures for the assessment of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, and self-concept. The IAT has been found to outperform the SC-IAT in predicting behavioral choices. However, the comparison between the IAT and the SC-IAT might have been affected by many differences in both the administration and the scoring of the two procedures. This study was aimed at developing a common scoring procedure for the IAT and the SC-IAT that would allow a fair comparison of the two. Results supported the higher accuracy of the IAT in predicting the behavioral choice, regardless of the scoring procedure. Implications of the results and limitations of the study are discussed.

A fairer comparison between the Implicit Association Test and the Single Category – Implicit Association Test

Epifania Ottavia Marina
;
Anselmi Pasquale;Robusto Egidio
2020

Abstract

The Implicit Association Test (IAT) and the Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT) are the most common procedures for the assessment of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, and self-concept. The IAT has been found to outperform the SC-IAT in predicting behavioral choices. However, the comparison between the IAT and the SC-IAT might have been affected by many differences in both the administration and the scoring of the two procedures. This study was aimed at developing a common scoring procedure for the IAT and the SC-IAT that would allow a fair comparison of the two. Results supported the higher accuracy of the IAT in predicting the behavioral choice, regardless of the scoring procedure. Implications of the results and limitations of the study are discussed.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3308649
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact