Roelofs, Piai, and Schriefers (Language and Cognitive Processes) test both the WEAVER++ model of word production and the response-exclusion account of performance in Stroop-like tasks against data from the word-word interference (WWI) task, and conclude that whereas the WEAVER++ successfully accounts for those data, the response-exclusion hypothesis fails. Here we show that once recent data from the WWI task are considered, both models fail.
Semantic effects in the word–word interference task: a comment on Roelofs, Piai, and Schriefers (2013)
MULATTI, CLAUDIO
2015
Abstract
Roelofs, Piai, and Schriefers (Language and Cognitive Processes) test both the WEAVER++ model of word production and the response-exclusion account of performance in Stroop-like tasks against data from the word-word interference (WWI) task, and conclude that whereas the WEAVER++ successfully accounts for those data, the response-exclusion hypothesis fails. Here we show that once recent data from the WWI task are considered, both models fail.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
treccani.&.mulatti.lcn.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
Postprint (accepted version)
Licenza:
Accesso libero
Dimensione
198.34 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
198.34 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
