OBJECTIVE: In patients with a history of lymphoma, each lymphadenopathy should be carefully evaluated. The aims of this study were to evaluate (i) the usefulness of high-resolution ultrasonography (US), US-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and flow cytometry phenotyping (FCP) together in the diagnosis of recurrent lymphoma and (ii) whether these tools were independent predictors of correct results. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with stepwise forward logistic regression analysis of results. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 151 patients with a history of lymphoma who developed a cervical mass during follow-up. METHODS: On neck US, a lymphadenopathy was shown in 129 (85.4%) patients (median age 57 years, range 18-78 years), and US-guided FNAC combined with FCP were immediately performed. All patients had surgical excision and subsequent histological examination of the enlarged node(s), to establish lymphoma subclassification. RESULTS: Final histology confirmed recurrence in 82 (63.6%) patients. According to the logistic regression analysis, FNAC and FCP were independent predictors of correct results (P = 0.009 and 0.028, respectively) and did not interfere with each other. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the combination of all of the tools were 98.8%, 100% and 99.2%, respectively, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.902 (95% CI: 0.797-0.986). CONCLUSION: This minimally invasive procedure is easily performed and should be recommended for all patients with cervical lymphadenopathy and a history of lymphoma, avoiding the need of core-biopsy or surgical excision if recurrence was excluded.

Image-guided FNA cytology and flow cytometry phenotyping of neck lymphadenopathy for the diagnosis of recurrent lymphoma

LUMACHI, FRANCO
Writing – Review & Editing
;
FASSINA, AMBROGIO
Supervision
;
TREGNAGHI, ALBERTO
Investigation
;
ERMANI, MARIO
Software
2017

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In patients with a history of lymphoma, each lymphadenopathy should be carefully evaluated. The aims of this study were to evaluate (i) the usefulness of high-resolution ultrasonography (US), US-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and flow cytometry phenotyping (FCP) together in the diagnosis of recurrent lymphoma and (ii) whether these tools were independent predictors of correct results. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with stepwise forward logistic regression analysis of results. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 151 patients with a history of lymphoma who developed a cervical mass during follow-up. METHODS: On neck US, a lymphadenopathy was shown in 129 (85.4%) patients (median age 57 years, range 18-78 years), and US-guided FNAC combined with FCP were immediately performed. All patients had surgical excision and subsequent histological examination of the enlarged node(s), to establish lymphoma subclassification. RESULTS: Final histology confirmed recurrence in 82 (63.6%) patients. According to the logistic regression analysis, FNAC and FCP were independent predictors of correct results (P = 0.009 and 0.028, respectively) and did not interfere with each other. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the combination of all of the tools were 98.8%, 100% and 99.2%, respectively, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.902 (95% CI: 0.797-0.986). CONCLUSION: This minimally invasive procedure is easily performed and should be recommended for all patients with cervical lymphadenopathy and a history of lymphoma, avoiding the need of core-biopsy or surgical excision if recurrence was excluded.
2017
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3219495
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact