The minimal effects hypothesis states that political campaigns only marginally persuade and convert voters. The hypothesis was formulated during early research into electoral behaviour between the 1940s and the 1960s. The hypothesis seemed solid and was associated with the general assumption that voters had clear positions on issues and knew where candidates stood on these issues. Since then the minimal effects hypothesis has been criticized and empirical research since the 1980s has suggested that voters do have uncertainties about candidates' positions and these uncertainties do influence voters' decisions.
The minimal effects hypothesis states that political campaigns only marginally persuade and convert voters. The hypothesis was formulated during early research into electoral behaviour between the 1940s and the 1960s. The hypothesis seemed solid and was associated with the general assumption that voters had clear positions on issues and knew where candidates stood on these issues. Since then the minimal effects hypothesis has been criticized and empirical research since the 1980s has suggested that voters do have uncertainties about candidates' positions and these uncertainties do influence voters' decisions.
Minimal Effects Theory
MORINI, MARCO
2014
Abstract
The minimal effects hypothesis states that political campaigns only marginally persuade and convert voters. The hypothesis was formulated during early research into electoral behaviour between the 1940s and the 1960s. The hypothesis seemed solid and was associated with the general assumption that voters had clear positions on issues and knew where candidates stood on these issues. Since then the minimal effects hypothesis has been criticized and empirical research since the 1980s has suggested that voters do have uncertainties about candidates' positions and these uncertainties do influence voters' decisions.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.