The present study evaluates the accuracy of computed tomographic (CT) scan and positron emission tomography with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET)/CT for the quantification of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Data were retrospectively collected for 58 patients, who were considered for CRS and HIPEC. The predictability, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy values of FDG-PET/CT and CT were tested. Preoperative CT and FDG-PET/CT failed to detect PC in 9% and 17% of cases, respectively, with a sensitivity of 91% and 82%, a specificity of 33% and 67%, an area under the curve (AUC) of 62% and 74% and a negative likelihood ratio of 027 (CI.95 0.07-1.09) and 027 (CI.95 0.11-0.62), respectively (p=0.469). Both techniques showed a high prevalence of PC extent underestimation (CT 47% and FDG-PET/CT 43% of cases). Small bowel involvement and optimal CRS had a prevalence of 60% and 76%, respectively, and both the CT and FDG-PET/CT imaging techniques were inaccurate at predicting them (AUC 53% and 52% for small bowel involvement, and 63% and 58% for optimal CRS, respectively). In conclusion both CT and FDG-PET/CT had low preoperative staging reliability for PC, and this can strongly influence the ability to implement the correct treatment strategy for patients with PC.

Preoperative assessment of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy following cytoreductive surgery.

LUMACHI, FRANCO
2014

Abstract

The present study evaluates the accuracy of computed tomographic (CT) scan and positron emission tomography with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET)/CT for the quantification of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Data were retrospectively collected for 58 patients, who were considered for CRS and HIPEC. The predictability, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy values of FDG-PET/CT and CT were tested. Preoperative CT and FDG-PET/CT failed to detect PC in 9% and 17% of cases, respectively, with a sensitivity of 91% and 82%, a specificity of 33% and 67%, an area under the curve (AUC) of 62% and 74% and a negative likelihood ratio of 027 (CI.95 0.07-1.09) and 027 (CI.95 0.11-0.62), respectively (p=0.469). Both techniques showed a high prevalence of PC extent underestimation (CT 47% and FDG-PET/CT 43% of cases). Small bowel involvement and optimal CRS had a prevalence of 60% and 76%, respectively, and both the CT and FDG-PET/CT imaging techniques were inaccurate at predicting them (AUC 53% and 52% for small bowel involvement, and 63% and 58% for optimal CRS, respectively). In conclusion both CT and FDG-PET/CT had low preoperative staging reliability for PC, and this can strongly influence the ability to implement the correct treatment strategy for patients with PC.
2014
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3134525
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 14
  • Scopus 46
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 40
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact