Previous research by Latrofa et al. (2010) found that women were more strongly identified with their gender then men, thus leading to stronger self-stereotyping. However, other research has found that women are not identified with their gender more strongly than men. Therefore, ingroup identification cannot be the primary cause of self-stereotyping. Consistent with this premise, in Experiment 1 (N = 67) we showed that women were equally identified with their gender ingroup as men, but nevertheless they self-stereotyped more strongly than men. Given the findings of Experiment 1, we tested the hypothesis that ingroup membership is chronically more accessible for women, thus leading to stronger self-stereotyping. In Experiment 2 (N = 39) and Experiment 3 (N = 56), participants performed a) a Gender Self-Categorization IAT to assess the associations between the Self and the Ingroup Gender, that is the accessibility of ingroup membership, and b) a Self-Stereotyping IAT to assess the strength of automatic associations between Self and ingroup stereotypical traits. As expected, women showed stronger implicit Self-Categorization as well as stronger implicit Self-Stereotyping than men. Moreover, as predicted, the relation between participants’ Gender and Self-Stereotyping was mediated by the level of Self-Categorization. Therefore, for women, the chronic salience of ingroup membership causes Self-Stereotyping. Results are discussed with reference to women as a minority status group.

Why do Women Self-Stereotype more than Men? The Mediational Role of Implicit Gender Self-Categorization.

CADINU, MARIA ROSARIA;GALDI, SILVIA
2011

Abstract

Previous research by Latrofa et al. (2010) found that women were more strongly identified with their gender then men, thus leading to stronger self-stereotyping. However, other research has found that women are not identified with their gender more strongly than men. Therefore, ingroup identification cannot be the primary cause of self-stereotyping. Consistent with this premise, in Experiment 1 (N = 67) we showed that women were equally identified with their gender ingroup as men, but nevertheless they self-stereotyped more strongly than men. Given the findings of Experiment 1, we tested the hypothesis that ingroup membership is chronically more accessible for women, thus leading to stronger self-stereotyping. In Experiment 2 (N = 39) and Experiment 3 (N = 56), participants performed a) a Gender Self-Categorization IAT to assess the associations between the Self and the Ingroup Gender, that is the accessibility of ingroup membership, and b) a Self-Stereotyping IAT to assess the strength of automatic associations between Self and ingroup stereotypical traits. As expected, women showed stronger implicit Self-Categorization as well as stronger implicit Self-Stereotyping than men. Moreover, as predicted, the relation between participants’ Gender and Self-Stereotyping was mediated by the level of Self-Categorization. Therefore, for women, the chronic salience of ingroup membership causes Self-Stereotyping. Results are discussed with reference to women as a minority status group.
2011
-
16° EASP General Meeting
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3032522
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact