A rose by any other name is still a rose: A reinterpretation of Hantsch and Mädebach

The Response Exclusion Hypothesis localises the semantic interference effect as observed in the pictureword paradigm at a postlexical level of processing. An important aspect of this proposal is that the ease with which distractor words can be excluded from production at the response level is determined by the degree to which they satisfy criteria demanded of a correct response. This proposal predicts that naming a picture of a ‘‘rose’’ with the response ‘‘flower’’ will be slower with the distractor ‘‘rose’’ than a distractor word that would not be appropriate for the picture (e.g., ‘‘tulip’’). Hantsch and Ma¨debach report evidence consistent with this expectation; however, the authors argue that the results are problematic for the Response Exclusion Hypothesis. Here we unpack Hantsch and Ma¨debach’s arguments about why their finding is (putatively) problematic for the Response Exclusion Hypothesis. We conclude that the pattern of effects that the authors report are not only in line with what would be expected by the Response Exclusion Hypothesis, but are difficult to reconcile with Hantsch and Ma¨debach’s preferred theoretical position.