The development of a technique for measuring the sensitivity of baroreceptors is described. This technique exploits the principles of parametric identification using ARMAX models: the input–output behaviour (systolic pressure–heart rate) of the baroreceptor system is identified, and thus its sensitivity. The cost function for choosing the model is defined by generalising the classic sum of square residuals, i.e., introducing cross-correlation between input and residuals and auto-correlation of residuals. The resulting algorithm is compared with the ‘modulus’ technique (Robbe et al., 1987) by means of simulated data with added noise. In the case of modulus, the systematic error increases considerably with noise. This tendency towards overestimation is quantified to 118% (percentage error divided by ratio of noise to signal root-mean-square values), whereas that of the proposed technique is only 12.5%. Experimental data was used to study the correlation between the measurements obtained using the two techniques (Pearson’s correlation index was 0.81). This analysis confirmed the tendency to overestimation of modulus.

Measurement of human baroreceptor reflex sensitivity by means of parametric identification

ANGRILLI, ALESSANDRO;
1998

Abstract

The development of a technique for measuring the sensitivity of baroreceptors is described. This technique exploits the principles of parametric identification using ARMAX models: the input–output behaviour (systolic pressure–heart rate) of the baroreceptor system is identified, and thus its sensitivity. The cost function for choosing the model is defined by generalising the classic sum of square residuals, i.e., introducing cross-correlation between input and residuals and auto-correlation of residuals. The resulting algorithm is compared with the ‘modulus’ technique (Robbe et al., 1987) by means of simulated data with added noise. In the case of modulus, the systematic error increases considerably with noise. This tendency towards overestimation is quantified to 118% (percentage error divided by ratio of noise to signal root-mean-square values), whereas that of the proposed technique is only 12.5%. Experimental data was used to study the correlation between the measurements obtained using the two techniques (Pearson’s correlation index was 0.81). This analysis confirmed the tendency to overestimation of modulus.
1998
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
DeCecco.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Published (publisher's version)
Licenza: Accesso gratuito
Dimensione 188.05 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
188.05 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/2495959
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact