For many years now authors interested in psychodynamic empirical research have debated on “clinical data” and how they can be defined, observed and reported. In particular audio-recorded versus hand transcript of sessions are widely discussed. Few research project had compared empirically these two ways of recording clinical material. The aim of this paper is to compare audio-recorded versus hand transcript of 18 supportive psychotherapy sessions of a male patient. The sessions were assessed using different instruments: some already existing in the literature and others modified especially for this project from previous existing ones. The paper also highlights limitations of this project and future projects.
Analisi del Process su un Caso Singolo: Confronto tra Trascritto su Memoria e Trascritto Audioregistrato.
LIS, ADRIANA;SALCUNI, SILVIA;DI RISO, DANIELA;
2005
Abstract
For many years now authors interested in psychodynamic empirical research have debated on “clinical data” and how they can be defined, observed and reported. In particular audio-recorded versus hand transcript of sessions are widely discussed. Few research project had compared empirically these two ways of recording clinical material. The aim of this paper is to compare audio-recorded versus hand transcript of 18 supportive psychotherapy sessions of a male patient. The sessions were assessed using different instruments: some already existing in the literature and others modified especially for this project from previous existing ones. The paper also highlights limitations of this project and future projects.
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
