Abstract Scintigraphy using anti-granulocyte Fab' fragment (LeukoScan) was performed in a series of 220 consecutive patients with suspected bone infection referred to our centre between September 1999 and June 2002. Two protocols were compared for interpreting scans: (1) evaluation of early 4 h imaging alone (protocol A), and (2) evaluation both of early and delayed 24 h imaging (protocol B). Protocol A and protocol B showed equal values of sensitivity (91.9% in patients with diabetic foot and 84.2% in patients with joint prosthesis/peripheral bone implants). Conversely, specificity was higher adopting protocol B than protocol A: 87.5% vs 75.0% in patients with diabetic foot, and 85.7% vs 76.2% in patients with joint prosthesis/peripheral bone implants, respectively. In particular, an improvement in specificity using protocol B was found in those patients with infection and with only a mild LeukoScan uptake in the early 4 h imaging: in these patients an increasing uptake intensity pattern observed in the delayed 24 h imaging was indicative of infection while a decreasing pattern suggested a negative result. Instead, the evidence of a high uptake intensity in the early LeukoScan imaging was a strong indicator of infection and delayed imaging in these cases did not further improve specificity. In conclusion, in our experience, LeukoScan showed high sensitivity in diagnosing bone infection in patients with diabetic foot and joint prosthesis or other peripheral bone implants. Moreover, in patients with an early high LeukoScan uptake intensity further delayed images appears unnecessary for the purpose of diagnosing infection. In contrast in patients with an early mild LeukoScan uptake intensity only, delayed imaging appears to be recommendable for improving specificity.
Role of anti-granulocyte Fab ' fragment antibody scintigraphy (LeukoScan) in evaluating bone infection: acquisition protocol, interpretation criteria and clinical results
MARAN, ALBERTO;AVOGARO, ANGELO;TIENGO, ANTONIO;
2004
Abstract
Abstract Scintigraphy using anti-granulocyte Fab' fragment (LeukoScan) was performed in a series of 220 consecutive patients with suspected bone infection referred to our centre between September 1999 and June 2002. Two protocols were compared for interpreting scans: (1) evaluation of early 4 h imaging alone (protocol A), and (2) evaluation both of early and delayed 24 h imaging (protocol B). Protocol A and protocol B showed equal values of sensitivity (91.9% in patients with diabetic foot and 84.2% in patients with joint prosthesis/peripheral bone implants). Conversely, specificity was higher adopting protocol B than protocol A: 87.5% vs 75.0% in patients with diabetic foot, and 85.7% vs 76.2% in patients with joint prosthesis/peripheral bone implants, respectively. In particular, an improvement in specificity using protocol B was found in those patients with infection and with only a mild LeukoScan uptake in the early 4 h imaging: in these patients an increasing uptake intensity pattern observed in the delayed 24 h imaging was indicative of infection while a decreasing pattern suggested a negative result. Instead, the evidence of a high uptake intensity in the early LeukoScan imaging was a strong indicator of infection and delayed imaging in these cases did not further improve specificity. In conclusion, in our experience, LeukoScan showed high sensitivity in diagnosing bone infection in patients with diabetic foot and joint prosthesis or other peripheral bone implants. Moreover, in patients with an early high LeukoScan uptake intensity further delayed images appears unnecessary for the purpose of diagnosing infection. In contrast in patients with an early mild LeukoScan uptake intensity only, delayed imaging appears to be recommendable for improving specificity.
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
