A number of algorithms for computing the simulation preorder on Kripke structures and on labelled transition systems are available. Among them, the algorithm by Ranzato and Tapparo [2007] has the best time complexity,while the algorithm by Gentilini et al. [2003] – successively corrected by van Glabbeek and Ploeger [2008] – has the best space complexity. Both space and time complexities are critical issues in a simulation algorithm, in particular memory requirements are crucial in the context of model checking when dealing with large state spaces. Here, we propose a new simulation algorithm that is obtained as a space saving modification of the time efficient algorithm by Ranzato and Tapparo: a symbolic representation of sets is embedded in this algorithm so that any set of states manipulated by the algorithm can be efficiently stored as a set of blocks of a suitable state partition. It turns out that this novel simulation algorithm has a space complexity comparable with Gentilini et al.'s algorithm while improving on Gentilini et al.'s time bound.
Saving space in a time efficient simulation algorithm
CRAFA, SILVIA;RANZATO, FRANCESCO;
2011
Abstract
A number of algorithms for computing the simulation preorder on Kripke structures and on labelled transition systems are available. Among them, the algorithm by Ranzato and Tapparo [2007] has the best time complexity,while the algorithm by Gentilini et al. [2003] – successively corrected by van Glabbeek and Ploeger [2008] – has the best space complexity. Both space and time complexities are critical issues in a simulation algorithm, in particular memory requirements are crucial in the context of model checking when dealing with large state spaces. Here, we propose a new simulation algorithm that is obtained as a space saving modification of the time efficient algorithm by Ranzato and Tapparo: a symbolic representation of sets is embedded in this algorithm so that any set of states manipulated by the algorithm can be efficiently stored as a set of blocks of a suitable state partition. It turns out that this novel simulation algorithm has a space complexity comparable with Gentilini et al.'s algorithm while improving on Gentilini et al.'s time bound.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
originalFinalVersion.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Preprint (submitted version)
Licenza:
Accesso libero
Dimensione
258.01 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
258.01 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.