Background: In patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing surgery axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) still represents the most accurate means of determining the axillary node status. Unfortunately, such procedure is usually associated with prolonged serous drainage that may result in an increased risk of lymphedema. The aim of this study was to analyze whether the use of ultrasound scissors (US) in performing ALND may reduce the risk of long-term morbidity, subsequently improving the quality of life of patients. Methods: Ninety-seven women (median age 55 years, range 33-74) underwent modified radical mastectomy (N=40, 41.2 %) or breast-conserving surgery with ALND (N=57, 58.8%) for primary pT1-2 breast cancer. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo ALND by either using (Group A, N=51) or not using (Group B, N=46) US. Health-related quality-of-life was measured with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (MOS-SF-36). Assessment of pain was observed using the short form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Data were collected 15-18 months after surgery. Results: Age, BMI, tumor staging, number of removed and involved nodes, and type of surgery did not differ between Groups. Both total amount of drainage (449±152 vs. 384±131 mL; p=0.03), and the number of axillary seromas (19 of 51 vs. 24 of 46; p=0.14) were reduced in Group A patients. The results are shown in the table. Arm or shoulder pain was reported in 35% (Group A) and 52% (Group B) of patients (p=0.20). Conclusions: In patients undergoing ALND for breast cancer the use of US is useful both in reducing the total amount of drainage and the risk of seroma formation. However, such advantages may have a limited impact on long-term quality-of-life since only few parameters in the MOS-SF-36 form improved significantly.

Quality-of-life of breast cancer women who underwent axillary node dissection by using ultrasound scissors. A prospective clinical study

LUMACHI, FRANCO;ERMANI, MARIO
2005

Abstract

Background: In patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing surgery axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) still represents the most accurate means of determining the axillary node status. Unfortunately, such procedure is usually associated with prolonged serous drainage that may result in an increased risk of lymphedema. The aim of this study was to analyze whether the use of ultrasound scissors (US) in performing ALND may reduce the risk of long-term morbidity, subsequently improving the quality of life of patients. Methods: Ninety-seven women (median age 55 years, range 33-74) underwent modified radical mastectomy (N=40, 41.2 %) or breast-conserving surgery with ALND (N=57, 58.8%) for primary pT1-2 breast cancer. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo ALND by either using (Group A, N=51) or not using (Group B, N=46) US. Health-related quality-of-life was measured with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (MOS-SF-36). Assessment of pain was observed using the short form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Data were collected 15-18 months after surgery. Results: Age, BMI, tumor staging, number of removed and involved nodes, and type of surgery did not differ between Groups. Both total amount of drainage (449±152 vs. 384±131 mL; p=0.03), and the number of axillary seromas (19 of 51 vs. 24 of 46; p=0.14) were reduced in Group A patients. The results are shown in the table. Arm or shoulder pain was reported in 35% (Group A) and 52% (Group B) of patients (p=0.20). Conclusions: In patients undergoing ALND for breast cancer the use of US is useful both in reducing the total amount of drainage and the risk of seroma formation. However, such advantages may have a limited impact on long-term quality-of-life since only few parameters in the MOS-SF-36 form improved significantly.
2005
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/2432142
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 40
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact