Radical Prostatectomy: local recurrence and persistence of disease. Is it possible to hypothesize any responsibility of the surgeon?

Radical prostatectomy (RP) represents the most frequently chosen therapeutic option for treating newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer. Cancer recurrence after surgery is linked to biologic variables. But are these the only ones that must be considered to give an explanation of a possible local or distal recurrence, or can it also admit the possibility that an incorrectly conducted surgery has a negative role in the unfavorable evolution after PR? Prostate cancer recurrence, as a matter of fact, is related also to surgical technique. The PR, by definition is a surgical, potentially complicated act. Surgery outcomes depend on a whole series of factors: the surgeon's ability, and the way the surgical procedure is conducted, play an essential role. Here we evaluate the role of biological and surgical factors on biochemical recurrence.