An example of anomalous behaviour of the (Normalised) Probabilistic Rand Index – due to its non-monotonicity with the fraction of misclassified pixels – raises doubts on its suitability as a metric for cutaneous lesion segmentation.
Is (N)PRI suitable for evaluating automated segmentation of cutaneous lesions?
PESERICO STECCHINI NEGRI DE SALVI, ENOCH;SILLETTI, ALBERTO
2010
Abstract
An example of anomalous behaviour of the (Normalised) Probabilistic Rand Index – due to its non-monotonicity with the fraction of misclassified pixels – raises doubts on its suitability as a metric for cutaneous lesion segmentation.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
