The aim of the present study was to investigate children’s ability to complete idiom fragments embedded in stories. Previous studies found that children’s and preadolescents’ ability to comprehend a text was related to their ability to understand an idiomatic expression (Cain, Oakhill, & Lemmon, 2005; Levorato, Nesi, & Cacciari, 2004; Nippold, Moran, & Schwarz, 2001). Comprehension and production processes share a vast amount of conceptual and lexical knowledge. Hence, we hypothesized that children’s text reading comprehension skills also might be related to their ability to produce nonliteral completions. Skilled and less-skilled text comprehenders (age range from 7.4 to 10.3) were presented with short stories that ended with an idiomatic fragment (e.g., “Paul broke the . . .” for the idiom “break the ice”) and were asked to complete the story. The children’s completions were coded as Literal, Idiomatic, or Figurative, as in previous studies (Levorato & Cacciari, 1992, 1995). The results showed that children’s ability to understand a text was related to their ability to complete idiomatic fragments figuratively. Less-skilled comprehenders provided more literal completions than skilled comprehenders who, in turn, provided more idiomatic completions.
To break the….embarrassment: Text Comprehension Skills and Figurative Competence in skilled and less-skilled text comprehenders
LEVORATO, MARIA CHIARA;ROCH, MAJA;
2006
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate children’s ability to complete idiom fragments embedded in stories. Previous studies found that children’s and preadolescents’ ability to comprehend a text was related to their ability to understand an idiomatic expression (Cain, Oakhill, & Lemmon, 2005; Levorato, Nesi, & Cacciari, 2004; Nippold, Moran, & Schwarz, 2001). Comprehension and production processes share a vast amount of conceptual and lexical knowledge. Hence, we hypothesized that children’s text reading comprehension skills also might be related to their ability to produce nonliteral completions. Skilled and less-skilled text comprehenders (age range from 7.4 to 10.3) were presented with short stories that ended with an idiomatic fragment (e.g., “Paul broke the . . .” for the idiom “break the ice”) and were asked to complete the story. The children’s completions were coded as Literal, Idiomatic, or Figurative, as in previous studies (Levorato & Cacciari, 1992, 1995). The results showed that children’s ability to understand a text was related to their ability to complete idiomatic fragments figuratively. Less-skilled comprehenders provided more literal completions than skilled comprehenders who, in turn, provided more idiomatic completions.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.