This study provides a kinematic comparison of the response of 12 older persons (ages 60-70) and 12 young persons (ages 20-26) to a perturbation of object size during a reach-to-grasp movement. For 80 out of 100 trials, each participant reached to grasp an illuminated cylinder of either small or large diameter (0.7 and 8.0 cm, respectively). For 20 out of 100 trials, a visual perturbation occurred at movement onset. This perturbation consisted of a switch of illumination from 1 to the other cylinder. For the switch from large to small cylinder, participants changed the distal grasp from whole-hand prehension to precision grip. For the opposite switch, participants changed from precision grip to whole-hand prehension. The older participants successfully adapted to these perturbations but showed a more conservative approach. Generally the approach time as the hand neared the object was prolonged, and the coordination between transport and manipulation components was maintained when comparing perturbed with nonperturbed trials. Young participants showed a more flexible pattern with a decrease or loss of temporal coupling between the components. It is hypothesized that the more rigid movement pattern of older participants to unanticipated motor requirements could be a contributory factor to the higher incidence of accidents for this group.
Reorganization of prehension components following perturbation of object size
CASTIELLO, UMBERTO
1995
Abstract
This study provides a kinematic comparison of the response of 12 older persons (ages 60-70) and 12 young persons (ages 20-26) to a perturbation of object size during a reach-to-grasp movement. For 80 out of 100 trials, each participant reached to grasp an illuminated cylinder of either small or large diameter (0.7 and 8.0 cm, respectively). For 20 out of 100 trials, a visual perturbation occurred at movement onset. This perturbation consisted of a switch of illumination from 1 to the other cylinder. For the switch from large to small cylinder, participants changed the distal grasp from whole-hand prehension to precision grip. For the opposite switch, participants changed from precision grip to whole-hand prehension. The older participants successfully adapted to these perturbations but showed a more conservative approach. Generally the approach time as the hand neared the object was prolonged, and the coordination between transport and manipulation components was maintained when comparing perturbed with nonperturbed trials. Young participants showed a more flexible pattern with a decrease or loss of temporal coupling between the components. It is hypothesized that the more rigid movement pattern of older participants to unanticipated motor requirements could be a contributory factor to the higher incidence of accidents for this group.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.