The aim of this paper is to discuss Hughes’ formulation of three-dimensionalism. Firstly, I observe that the linguistic data do not clearly support his formulation. Secondly, the arguments he uses to state his formulation could be disputed either (i) on the basis of a difference between ordinary language and regimented language, or (ii) on the basis of a different notion of temporal part.
Comments on Hughes
CARRARA, MASSIMILIANO
2005
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to discuss Hughes’ formulation of three-dimensionalism. Firstly, I observe that the linguistic data do not clearly support his formulation. Secondly, the arguments he uses to state his formulation could be disputed either (i) on the basis of a difference between ordinary language and regimented language, or (ii) on the basis of a different notion of temporal part.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
