We obtain constraints on quintessence models from magnitude-redshift measurements of 176 Type Ia supernovae. The considered quintessence models are ordinary quintessence with Ratra-Peebles or supergravity (SUGRA) potentials, and extended quintessence with a Ratra-Peebles potential. We compute confidence regions in the Ωm0-α plane and find that for SUGRA potentials it is not possible to obtain useful constraints on these parameters; for the Ratra-Peebles case, for both the extended and ordinary quintessence we find α<~0.8 at the 1 σ level. We also consider simulated data sets for the Supernova/Acceleration Probe (SNAP) satellite for the same models. Again, for a SUGRA potential it is not possible to obtain constraints on α, while with a Ratra-Peebles potential, its value is determined, with an error <~0.6. We evaluate the inaccuracy made by approximating the time evolution of the equation of state with a linear or constant w(z) instead of using its exact redshift evolution. Finally, we discuss the effects of different systematic errors in the determination of quintessence parameters.
Constraints on Extended Quintessence from High-Redshift Supernovae
MATARRESE, SABINO;MOSCARDINI, LAURO
2004
Abstract
We obtain constraints on quintessence models from magnitude-redshift measurements of 176 Type Ia supernovae. The considered quintessence models are ordinary quintessence with Ratra-Peebles or supergravity (SUGRA) potentials, and extended quintessence with a Ratra-Peebles potential. We compute confidence regions in the Ωm0-α plane and find that for SUGRA potentials it is not possible to obtain useful constraints on these parameters; for the Ratra-Peebles case, for both the extended and ordinary quintessence we find α<~0.8 at the 1 σ level. We also consider simulated data sets for the Supernova/Acceleration Probe (SNAP) satellite for the same models. Again, for a SUGRA potential it is not possible to obtain constraints on α, while with a Ratra-Peebles potential, its value is determined, with an error <~0.6. We evaluate the inaccuracy made by approximating the time evolution of the equation of state with a linear or constant w(z) instead of using its exact redshift evolution. Finally, we discuss the effects of different systematic errors in the determination of quintessence parameters.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.