We investigate CEO turnover in relationship to performance, ownership concentration and CEO ownership in a sample of 60 private companies listed on the Italian Stock Exchanges over the 9-year period 1988–1996. Concentrated ownership, family control, limited institutional investors activism, and lack of main bank monitoring make Italy a corporate governance environment dominated by insiders. As a result, boards of directors are dominated by insiders and/or represent the interests of the controlling shareholders. Our main finding is that CEO turnover is negatively related to firm performance also in this environment, but this relationship holds only if the controlling shareholder is not the CEO. Our findings suggest that insiders with large stakes monitor and replace under-performing outside CEOs. The paper offers positive empirical evidence that non-CEO controlling shareholders are a governance mechanism that provides a substitute for outside members on boards of directors in lowering agency costs. When the CEO is an owner, however, we have all the negative aspects of insider-dominated boards.
CEO Turnover in Insider Dominated Boards: Evidence from Italy
BRUNELLO, GIORGIO;
2003
Abstract
We investigate CEO turnover in relationship to performance, ownership concentration and CEO ownership in a sample of 60 private companies listed on the Italian Stock Exchanges over the 9-year period 1988–1996. Concentrated ownership, family control, limited institutional investors activism, and lack of main bank monitoring make Italy a corporate governance environment dominated by insiders. As a result, boards of directors are dominated by insiders and/or represent the interests of the controlling shareholders. Our main finding is that CEO turnover is negatively related to firm performance also in this environment, but this relationship holds only if the controlling shareholder is not the CEO. Our findings suggest that insiders with large stakes monitor and replace under-performing outside CEOs. The paper offers positive empirical evidence that non-CEO controlling shareholders are a governance mechanism that provides a substitute for outside members on boards of directors in lowering agency costs. When the CEO is an owner, however, we have all the negative aspects of insider-dominated boards.
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
